ROI calculator for local authorities
One prevented placement breakdown pays for BFCA many times over. When a foster placement breaks down, a child is often moved into residential care, at roughly 6× the weekly cost. Investing in carer training and support that keeps placements stable costs a fraction of a single breakdown.
Work out your savingThe financial case
The financial case is simple: prevention costs a fraction of a breakdown.
per child, per year (escalation to residential)
wraparound service, per child, per year
if just one breakdown is prevented
Source: Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent. A residential place costs roughly £182,000 more per year than a foster placement, which is the core of every avoidable escalation.
Calculator
Enter the size of your carer cohort and how many breakdowns you think better support could prevent each year. The figures update as you type.
Cost avoided = breakdowns prevented × (residential − foster weekly cost) × 52 weeks. These are estimates to support planning, not a guarantee of savings.
Even if BFCA prevented only one placement breakdown across a whole cohort of carers, the investment returns many times over. Every breakdown avoided is a child who keeps their home, school and relationships, and a six-figure saving to the authority.
Book a conversation about your carer cohortFoster (£661/wk) and residential (£4,153/wk) unit costs: PSSRU, University of Kent, via GOV.UK Children's Social Care Market Study and CYP Now. Placement breakdown prevalence (26% overall; 34% adolescents): meta-analysis, Children and Youth Services Review. Placement instability (10% of looked-after children had 3+ placements in a year): GOV.UK, Children Looked After in England 2024–25. Annual escalation figure = (residential − foster weekly cost) × 52 weeks. Figures are conservative and editable.